Jnana Yoga
: The Path of Knowledge
On the other hand, the change of a
phenomenon into something else, as milk into cheese, is known as vikara. Sankara takes a position between the se two - ajatavada and
Vikaravda. He agrees that Brahman does not change. It remains the
same. But, for some reason or other, it appears to change; not like
milk into cheese, but rather as a rope appears to change into a
snake. There fore, Snakara expounded the vivarta, or mayavada
theory, which proclaims that it is through or by maya, or illusion,
that Brahman manifests itself. It is by the power of maya that the
One-without-a-second, Brahman, appears as the many. Sympathetically,
Sankara proposes the doctrine of maya, which makes non-existence
existent. He says, in effect: “All right, I’ll admit for the time
being that the world is real – relatively real. It is as real as the
snake superimposed on the rope is real. But when the light of
awakened consciousness shines on this world, you will
know it is not the snake. You will know its real nature.”
To discriminate, to distinguish the real
from the unreal – that is the theme of monism, or advaita, as
interpreted by Sankaracharya. The real and the unreal have to be
distinguished. “What sort of monism is that?” you may ask. Therein
lies the distinction between the philosophy of Sankaracharya and
that of his grand-guru, Gaudapada. Sankara assumes the existence of
the unreal. Under the influence of maya we are bound to see duality.
Sankara accepts this as a premise.
The vivartavada, or illusion theory, as expounded by Sankaracharya
classifies statement as vyavaharika, fact or relative truth, and
paramarthika, fundamental truth. A fact is a reproduction of a
happening, while truth is that which never changes. A fact may not
be true, but it is a fact because it has happened. Always try to
distinguish between relative truth and fundamental truth. Try to
understand these two aspects of any entity. See how a thing happens,
go back to its cause, and when you analyze how a thing happens, go
back to its cause, and when you analyze that cause you will know
that only one reality, not many, exists. The man in the rope-snake story did not
answer any of the questions about the snake because he knew there
was no snake. The snake – consciousness was illusion, maya. Maya is
this: we see a snake where ther eis no snake. Where there is only
One, we see many.
Sankara accepts the statements and experiences of people as
vyavaharika, fact or relative truth, and logically leads them to the
realization of paramarthika, or fundamental truth. Through logic
give up vyavaharika. Then give up logic, give up every thing! Logic
is for enjoyment, not for liberation. Logic is within maya, too.
Brahman cannot be infinite, omnipresent and omniscient if anything
else exists. Think it over. Man walks from one “ truth” to another.
All readings are relative. All readings of the final Truth are just
readings. When the Absolute is realized, it transcends all
operations.
Hindu Controversy, no doubt,
consolidates one’s opinion, and there fore it is good. Amidst all
the good and the bad, avoid reaction. When you reach the top you
will know that, good or bad, there is no difference. Both must be
ousted. All is illusion.
To a straict monist projection never took place. There cannot be any
maya. Where would it take place? There is nothing but Brahman.
Sankara said: “How can I tell you what maya is? I take your
statement as maya, and lead you right.”
If you admit of anything outside the sole reality of Brahman, you
are a dualist. Whether your Ideal be personal or impersonal, a God,
force, or a Christ, you are a dualist. In fact , if you admit of any
creation at all, you are a dualist. Sankara said that if you must
know something about this world go to Kapila ( the founder of the
Sankhya philosophy with its Purusha and the twenty-four categories
of evolution). As long as you are under the influence of maya, he
said, go to Kapila if you want an explanation. Sankara taught that
the world is maya or relative truth. It is a fact because it has
happened, but it is not Truth and it has no real existence.
Read
Previous
Read Next
|